Nutrition and agriculture policies govern many aspects of the food that is grown domestically or imported from other countries, as well as federal nutrition assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and the national school meal programs. These policies impact food choices and prices in outlets such as grocery stores, restaurants, and schools, thus affecting what we eat. Research in this area includes evaluating what impacts federal nutrition and agriculture programs and policies can have on diet and health.
Fast Fact
Nutrition & Agriculture Policy
Research & Publications
May 2018
Accessibility Landscapes of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Authorized Stores
This study aimed to: explore the number and spatial distribution of 9,556 SNAP stores in North Carolina by type and assess how SNAP benefit redemption is linked to store type; compare the demographics of populations living in areas with a high concentration of SNAP participants vs areas with a lower … More
April 2018
Examining the Feasibility of Healthy Minimum Stocking Standards for Small Food Stores
This study builds on the recommendations for healthy minimum stocking developed by an expert panel convened by Healthy Eating Research in 2015. It tests the feasibility of the standards and provides practical insight from retailers about implementation. Researchers collected qualitative and quantitative data from 57 small stores in four states … More
March 2018
Federal Nutrition Program Revisions Impact Low-income Households’ Food Purchases
The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) required major revisions to food packages in 2009. This study examines associations between WIC revisions and nutritional profiles of packaged food purchases from 2008 to 2014 among 4,537 low-income households with preschoolers in the U.S. using Nielsen Homescan Consumer … More
February 2018
Arguments Used in Public Comments to Support or Oppose the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Minimum Stocking Requirements: A Content Analysis
This content analysis examines the arguments used to support or oppose the USDA’s proposed rule that all SNAP-authorized retailers carry more nutritious foods. A random sample of public comments posted to the U.S. Federal Register was analyzed. Three main themes were discussed throughout the comments: 1) arguments used in opposition … More