This paper focused on the impact changes in soft drink taxes and policies restricting school vending machine access had on soda consumption among children and adolescents. The researchers used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and IV (1999-2006) and the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K). They concluded that as currently practiced, neither vending machine restrictions nor soft drink taxes will lead to noticeable weight reduction in children; typically imposed beverage taxes are neither large enough nor transparent enough to lead to meaningful behavior change, and policies restricting vending machine access in school do not reduce consumption because of the many other ways to obtain these drinks.
Published: May 2010
ID #: 65053
Journal: Health Aff (Millwood)
Authors: Fletcher JM, Frisvold D, Tefft N
Focus Areas: Beverages, Pricing & Economics, School & After School
Keywords: Body mass index (BMI), Competitive foods, Snacks, Sugar-sweetened beverages, Taxes, Vending machines
Age Groups: Elementary-age children (grades K to 5), Young adolescents (grades 6 to 8)
Resource Type: Journal Article
Race/Ethnicity: Multi-racial/ethnic
State: National
Related Research
January 2010
Can Soft Drink Taxes Reduce Population Weight?
This paper evaluates the impact of changes in state soft drink taxes on body mass index (BMI), obesity and overweight. Researchers found that weight responds to changes in soft drink taxes; an increase of 1% in the state soft drink tax rate leads to a decrease in BMI of 0.003 points and the influence of MoreAugust 2009
The Effects of Soft Drink Taxes on Child and Adolescent Consumption and Weight Outcomes
In this paper the authors investigate the potential for soft drink taxes to combat the rise in child and adolescent obesity levels through a reduction in consumption. Using state soft drink sales and excise tax information from 1989-2006 and National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) data, researchers find that currently practiced soft drink taxation MoreSeptember 2008