Start Date: November 2024

ID #: 82587

Principal Investigator: Emily Gutierrez, PhD, MS

Organization: Urban Institute

Funding Round: HER Round 14

See more related research

Share


The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) eligibility expansion intends to offer benefits to more students, yet leaders of eligible districts may choose not to apply for CEP to avoid related fiscal challenges, such as covering the cost of meals and potential loss of state aid. This project is the first to examine characteristics of the eligible schools and districts that choose to adopt CEP and then discontinue, or never adopt at all, to better inform future CEP policy changes. This study will examine districts’ historical adoption of CEP and the recent federal eligibility expansions to determine if newly eligible districts adopt CEP. The team will determine which students are most affected by the lack of CEP adoption and will examine district-level school food revenues and expenditures nationwide. This project will analyze national data on districts’ eligibility for CEP from 2015-2024 to determine which eligible schools and districts have either participated and ceased participating, or never participated, especially in the school years since the eligibility threshold was changed from 40-25%. The team will then conduct a difference-in-differences design to understand the fiscal effects of CEP. The target population includes all eligible districts in the nation from 2015-2025. In addition to identifying districts’ participation patterns, the team will examine CEP’s effects on school meal revenues and expenditures.

Resource Type: Grant Summary

State: National

Focus Area: School & After School

Keyword: School meal programs

Related Research

November 2024

School-based nutrition education programs alone are not cost effective for preventing childhood obesity: a microsimulation study

Although interventions to change nutrition policies, systems, and environments (PSE) for children are generally cost effective for preventing childhood obesity, existing evidence suggests that nutrition education curricula, without accompanying PSE changes, are more commonly implemented. This study aimed to estimate the societal costs and potential for cost-effectiveness of 3 nutrition education curricula frequently implemented in More

November 2023

Assessing participation in and implementation of summer electronic-benefits-transfer and non-congregate-meal programs in rural areas

Summer EBT and non-congregate meals are summer meal options that have known associations with reducing food hardship and barriers to food access. But take-up can vary across states, which creates disparities among marginalized populations. The study aims to analyze the coverage, take-up, and implementation decisions made around Summer EBT and non-congregate meals. The research team More

November 2023

Examining the economic value of free school meals to inform future policy decisions on expansion of free school meals in the U.S.

Growing evidence suggests free school meal policies improve student health outcomes and nutrition equity. A key barrier to passage of these policies is concerns regarding potential costs, thus, a broader value for money evaluation is essential to inform policy decisions. This study aims to compare ‘intervention’ states with free school meal policies (i.e., universal free More