A study in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association finds that limiting the availability of soft drinks in elementary schools may not significantly affect overall soda consumption by children. The study found that limiting soft drink availability in elementary schools was associated with only a 4 percent reduced likelihood of any consumption in the past week. For those with soft drinks available at school, rates of at school and overall consumption were highest among African-American children, children from low-income households and those who reside in rural areas.
Keywords: Competitive foods, Snacks, Sugar-sweetened beverages, Vending machines
Age Group: Elementary-age children (grades K to 5)
Resource Type: Journal Article
Race/Ethnicity: Multi-racial/ethnic
State: National
Focus Area: School & After School
Related Research
February 2012
Junk Food in Schools and Childhood Obesity
This paper estimates the effects of junk food availability on body mass index (BMI), obesity, and related outcomes among a national sample of fifth graders. The researchers found that junk food availability does not significantly increase BMI or obesity among this fifth-grade cohort despite the increased likelihood of in-school junk food purchases. Estimates suggest that MoreNovember 2008
Food Prices and Weight Gain During Elementary School: 5-Year Update
Elementary school children in communities with high produce prices are more likely to gain weight than those areas with low produce costs, according to a study published in Public Health. The study, Food Prices and Weight Gain During Elementary School: 5-year Update, showed that children who lived in the 15 areas where fruits and vegetables MoreJuly 2008
Disparities in the Food Environment Surrounding U.S. Middle and High Schools
Easy availability of snacks, sodas, alcohol, and fast food in the immediate vicinity of a school could easily negate school food policies. Surrounding food outlets could also lower the effectiveness of health education in the classroom by setting a highly visible example that counters educational messages. The most pernicious one is arguably the location of MoreJune 2006