Published: December 2016

ID #: CAS038

Publisher: Berkeley Media Studies Group

Authors: Nixon L, Gardin K, Seklir L, Gottlieb M, Dorfman L

See more related research

Share


To understand how advocates, schools, the food industry, policymakers, and others have shaped discussions about school nutrition at the state and local level since the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA), Berkeley Media Studies Group and the Public Health Advocacy Institute systematically examined news coverage and legislative and regulatory documents from 11 states. They analyzed how school meal and competitive food guidelines debates have been framed at the local and state level, who spoke about the guidelines and what they said, and how arguments and framing differed between states and between the news and legislative testimony. The news analysis found that most coverage was about implementation of nutrition guidelines for school meals. In contrast, the legislative and regulatory analysis found that the debate focused on competitive foods, and two-thirds of policy documents argued in favor of the guidelines. State and local food policy actions received the most positive news coverage, while federal guidelines drew the most opposition. School nutrition staff members were the most active speakers in the news about school food and in legislative and regulatory documents addressing nutrition guidelines, and discussed the guidelines positively. Students, federal elected officials, school administrators, and teachers were mostly critical of the nutrition guidelines in the news coverage studied.

Related Research

June 2016

Examining State and Local-level Debates about School Nutrition Guidelines since the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act

The purpose of this project is to understand how advocates, the food industry, policymakers, and others have shaped discussions about school nutrition at the state and local level since the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) by systematically examining news coverage and legislative documents from selected states. The study will specifically examine: 1) More

September 2022

Implementing SNAP During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the National Network of State SNAP Administrators

SNAP was a critical component of the COVID-19 pandemic response. The beginning of the pandemic saw the largest increase in applications in the program’s history, and the pandemic fundamentally altered how SNAP agencies deliver benefits, interact with participants, and provide supportive services. The goal of this research was to examine SNAP implementation during the first More

September 2022

State Implementation of SNAP Waivers and Flexibilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives From State Agency Leaders

This study aimed to describe state agencies’ implementation of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, barriers and facilitators to SNAP implementation, and recommendations to improve SNAP implementation. This study was qualitative, using 7 semistructured, virtual focus groups in April 2021 with state-level SNAP administrators and supportive services More