To characterize retail food environments and identify areas with limited retail access, researchers, government programs, and community advocates have primarily used secondary retail food outlet data sources. This systematic review examines the evidence for validity reported for secondary retail food outlet data sources for characterizing retail food environments. A literature search was conducted through December 2012 to identify peer-reviewed published literature that compared secondary retail food outlet data sources to primary data sources (i.e., field observations) for accuracy of identifying the type and location of retail food outlets. Nineteen studies were included in the review. Researchers found that the evidence for validity reported varied by secondary data source examined, primary data-gathering approaches, retail food outlets examined, and geographic and sociodemographic characteristics. More than half of the studies (53%) did not report evidence for validity by type of food outlet examined and by a particular secondary data source.
Published: October 2013
ID #: 66958
Journal: Am J Prev Med
Authors: Fleischhacker SE, Evenson KR, Sharkey J, Jilcott Pitts SB, Rodriquez DA
Race/Ethnicity: African American or Black, Latino(a) or Hispanic, Multi-racial/ethnic
Keywords: Corner store, Farmers' markets, Fast food, Food outlet, Geographic information systems, Grocery store, Restaurant, Rural, Supermarket, Urban
Focus Areas: Food Access, Food Retail
Resource Type: Journal Article
Related Research
November 2012
Evidence for Validity of Five Secondary Data Sources for Enumerating Retail Food Outlets in Seven American Indian Communities in North Carolina
This study compared the results of direct, on-site observations of a wide range of food outlets in multiple American Indian communities in North Carolina, without a list guiding the field observation, to several secondary data sources. Researchers identified 699 food outlets during primary on-site data collection. The match rate for primary and secondary data differed MoreSeptember 2012
Tools for Healthy Tribes: Improving Access to Healthy Foods in Indian Country
This paper describes how the American Indian Healthy Eating Project evolved through five phases: 1) starting the conversation; 2) conducting multidisciplinary formative research; 3) strengthening partnerships and tailoring policy options; 4) disseminating community-generated ideas; and 5) accelerating action while fostering sustainability. The article discusses each phase’s essential steps, outcomes derived, and lessons learned. Collectively, these MoreJuly 2011
Engaging Tribal Leaders in an American Indian Healthy Eating Project Through Modified Talking Circles
Frequently used in the American Indian community, a Talking Circle is a method used by a group to discuss a topic in an egalitarian and non-confrontational manner. This article documents the development and implementation of a modified Talking Circle as a research tool to engage tribal leaders in an American Indian healthy eating project in MoreNovember 2009