Published: December 2016

ID #: CAS038

Publisher: Berkeley Media Studies Group

Authors: Nixon L, Gardin K, Seklir L, Gottlieb M, Dorfman L

See more related research

Share


To understand how advocates, schools, the food industry, policymakers, and others have shaped discussions about school nutrition at the state and local level since the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA), Berkeley Media Studies Group and the Public Health Advocacy Institute systematically examined news coverage and legislative and regulatory documents from 11 states. They analyzed how school meal and competitive food guidelines debates have been framed at the local and state level, who spoke about the guidelines and what they said, and how arguments and framing differed between states and between the news and legislative testimony. The news analysis found that most coverage was about implementation of nutrition guidelines for school meals. In contrast, the legislative and regulatory analysis found that the debate focused on competitive foods, and two-thirds of policy documents argued in favor of the guidelines. State and local food policy actions received the most positive news coverage, while federal guidelines drew the most opposition. School nutrition staff members were the most active speakers in the news about school food and in legislative and regulatory documents addressing nutrition guidelines, and discussed the guidelines positively. Students, federal elected officials, school administrators, and teachers were mostly critical of the nutrition guidelines in the news coverage studied.

Related Research

June 2016

Examining State and Local-level Debates about School Nutrition Guidelines since the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act

The purpose of this project is to understand how advocates, the food industry, policymakers, and others have shaped discussions about school nutrition at the state and local level since the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) by systematically examining news coverage and legislative documents from selected states. The study will specifically examine: 1) More

September 2025

Food Insecurity-Related Stigma Among Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review

This review aimed to characterize individual- and structural-level stigma associated with government (ie, SNAP, WIC) and emergency food program (ie, food banks, pantries, cupboards, soup kitchens) utilization in the US. 5 databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts) were searched in June 2024. The review included peer-reviewed articles (January 2004 – June 2024), More

August 2025

Lived Experiences of Families Navigating Safety Net Expansions and Retractions During the Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

This study aimed to understand the experiences of families with low income in California with pandemic safety net support expansions and retractions, including barriers to program access. Using open-ended questions, we explored the self-reported experiences of pandemic-era safety net expansions and expirations between January and June 2023 among a group of caregivers of young children More