Start Date: February 2016

ID #: CAS033

Organization: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Project Lead: Angie Cradock, ScD, MPE

See more related research


The purpose of this project is to determine which state Safe Routes to School (SRTS) equity funding best practice processes and procedures best facilitate applications and awards in vulnerable communities. Researchers will document SRTS equity funding best practices used in each state and use national data on awards to schools between 2006 and 2015 to estimate the impact of best practices on state-specific award rates over time, according to school-level student socio-economic status. They will use an online survey to collect data on the practices and policies and date(s) implemented in each state, based on 10 currently identified best practice recommendations. Relevant documents will also be collected and coded to create an index of best practices for equitable funding in each state (Equity Funding Index). The research team will use a repeated-measure, natural-experiment design to test whether changes in states adopting more or a greater variety of Equity Funding Index best practices over time are related to changes in the annual award rate among high-poverty schools and the relative rates of funding of high-poverty schools compared to low-poverty schools. A policy brief will present key findings to inform the development of state SRTS guidelines for best practices to promote equity.

Related Research

January 2017

Examining Practices that Promote Access to Safe Routes to School Programs in Vulnerable Communities

Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs in multiple states have adopted several approaches to reduce barriers faced by schools in low-income communities in applying for and implementing a SRTS award. This study aimed to determine which of these practices for equitable funding were successful in promoting SRTS implementation within vulnerable communities. To assess state practices, More

March 2023

Reducing Student Exposure to Digital Food and Beverage Marketing: Policy and Practice Recommendations

Digital marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children and adolescents is pervasive, highly effective, undermines healthy eating, and contributes to health inequities. Expanded use of electronic devices and remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the urgency for policy interventions to limit digital food marketing in schools and on school-issued devices. The US More

February 2023

Rapid Health Impact Assessment on Changes to School Nutrition Standards to Align with 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

The national school breakfast and lunch programs administered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) are cornerstone federal nutrition assistance programs. School meals are one of the healthiest sources of foods for school-age children, which is significant as some children receive up to half of their daily calories at school. Policy opportunities in 2023 More