This study builds on the recommendations for healthy minimum stocking developed by an expert panel convened by Healthy Eating Research in 2015. It tests the feasibility of the standards and provides practical insight from retailers about implementation. Researchers collected qualitative and quantitative data from 57 small stores in four states (Arizona, Delaware, Minnesota, and North Carolina) that accepted Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Store interviews revealed a reluctant willingness to stock healthy food and meet new recommendations. No stores met recommended fruit and vegetable stocking and few stores met requirements for other food categories (i.e., whole grains and low-fat dairy). In contrast to the inventory observed, most owners believed store stock met basic recommendations. Findings reveal that store owners may be willing to stock healthy food but may need technical support to make this shift.
Published: April 2018
ID #: CAS036
Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet
Authors: Karpyn A, DeWeese RS, Pelletier JE, et al.
States: Arizona, Delaware, Minnesota, North Carolina
Keywords: Corner store, Food outlet, Fruits and vegetables, Nutrition standards, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
Focus Areas: Food Retail, Nutrition Policy & Programs
Resource Type: Journal Article
Related Research
March 2016
Understanding the Feasibility of Implementing the Recommendations for Minimum Stocking Levels and Marketing Strategies for Small Retail Food Stores
The purposes of this project are to: 1) understand the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Minimum Stocking Levels and Marketing Strategies of Healthful Foods for Small Retail Food Stores recommendations developed in 2015 among stores most likely to face challenges (rural and urban, dollar and family-owned stores), and 2) obtain a baseline MoreJune 2025
Community Engaged Research Strategies Used in Food Retail Interventions: A Scoping Review
The purpose of this scoping review is to identify what community engagement (CE) research approaches have been applied by researchers in the retail food environment (RFE) intervention literature and how they vary by type of retail settings, phase of intervention, year of intervention, and key domains of equity. A total of 98 RFE interventions reported MoreJune 2025